In the days preceding the date of Friday, July 13 to the gardens of Baraccano, we received several submissions by the family of "Frederick, one of the alleged victims of this affair, which at the material time he was two and a half. In taking forward this appointment we thought Bo-noir appropriate to tell the story related only to those acts and those documents that have been recognized as valid in court, without reopening a debate on those facts. But it seemed appropriate to read during the evening part of the letter from the grandfather of "Fred" on the blog that we offer in full.
Dear Mr. Marchesini,
are the grandfather of "Federico", and since I was offered the chance to know the exchange of letters I had with my son, The I apologize if I dare to intervene.
you three decided hatchet, referring to the decision at first instance, to that of the second, the waiver of the third relies on landmarks that clearly deny any possibility of even a modest reply. I can see the cut that we tend to give the evening in question, I think is a miscarriage of justice to keep an old man now since that can not and must give voice to the "losers because they would undermine the setting of departure.
The advance at once that it is not my intention to disrupt what you are going to make it mean venturing intricate area of \u200b\u200bthe error 'error.
I tell you, however, that each of us, whatever the field in which existential moves because of what he knows, and how it can best he can, and do not necessarily always reach the absolute, and I think this is granted it extend to justice.
I found myself about 66 years to set foot for the first time, and to date only, in a courtroom, I must admit with difficulty, not so driven by hunger for leading role, considering it an indispensable should act towards my nephew.
The impression I received (the very personal and probably biased charity) of the mechanisms of justice was not just embracing. I do not remember too much from someone, the use of the option not to respond by others, then the facts and circumstances which, in my opinion deserved thorough answers are evaporated, evaporated, and also tracks spoon fed in the opposite direction to the objective.
one example.
There was a child (boy today as there are many) that two and a half years had a tremendous sense of direction and a keen observation of things around him
One day it happens:
1. regresses feeding using only liquid to return to the bottle.
2. stubbornly refuses to change diapers, do not want to wash the baby's bottom
3. blasphemy often when none of the people with whom he makes contact
4. does not want to go out from the house, even to go into the garden
5. sometimes animal hides under the table
6. no longer intends to return to their bed after temporarily transferred to the baby sitter cousin (only replacement will put an end to the problem) and many other things. It 'the same child that the police will show a different path than the one who wanted to travel to reach the cemetery and the nearby abandoned church Nugareto place of satanic rituals.
Come back to the emotion the child will vomit suffered in a car by that time we said enough, let's keep it out of the process.
Well against all the foregoing, a lawyer of the accused in the final session of the hearing stated that on that month-long trial, which extends occult direction, the long shadow of S. Domenico.
But how do you dawdle in such misleading arguments? I realize to make me take my hand and point to the conclusion with two related references to the two verdicts. The first is that after the ruling the "Resto del Carlino" features a cover letter that my reflections on it.
The day after this Chief Justice meets Dr. Cornia XIII Square in August just in the plot ns. deputy attorney, and asks if the letter bearing the signature "Grandpa Fred" had written him.
obtained a negative answer then asked news about the health of the child wishes a speedy recovery, and with reference to that content takes leave saying, "The Law is the Law." There are then two truths and one of them is that legal?
The second reference is to appeal the sentence where it says the girl lied (it should be noted that no contact, just none we had before, during and after the process with this one) while the child's family members are worthy of credibility. Well. Where that credibility has landed?
She says that at the time the media have been lacking, it can be. I have to take into consideration the well with different weight had to declare publicly the then chief prosecutor Dr. Ennio Fortuna: "Knowing the pleadings are amazed at this sentence."
The I extend my best wishes for the success of your initiative.
without irony misunderstandings in the future if you want you could take an initiative in the opposite eased what has been entangled in the folds of the proceedings. The material exists and is not manipulated for his own use and consumption.
grateful for a written acknowledgment of receipt.
With best regards,
Letter signed
0 comments:
Post a Comment